Beijing Saint state international successful agents in Yantai like according to line Clothing Co., Ltd., YYH administrative litigation, the first instance, the second instance of success

The judges to apply the trademark "YYH" specified in the use of commodities for clothing, and the "1202797", "Yuanyang emperor YUANYANGHUANG and trademark (the cited trademark) compared to the difference was not significant, specify the use in the same kind of goods or similar goods is likely to cause confusion and misidentification, constitute the same or similar trademark on the grounds similar goods, according to the company for review reason not to support it.
According to Yantai Garment Co. No. 48912nd company refused to accept the ruling, bring a lawsuit to the Beijing intellectual property court, Shengzhou lawyer as agent for sample attended the court proceedings. We put forward the "trademark and the cited trademark a call and meaning have obvious difference, for a similar trademark. Two trademarks will not cause publicconfusion coexistence." point of view. The intellectual property court approval, after the trial, the Beijing intellectual property court verdict revoked the judges made business review word [2014] No. 48912nd trademark dismissed the review decision and ordered the defendant to make a decision.
The Trademark Review and Adjudication Board refused to accept the Beijing Intellectual Property Court (2014) Beijing as early word no. fifty-first administrative judgment, and appealed to the Supreme People's Court of Beijing, Yantai for Garment Co. Ltd. responding, and submit relevant evidence, after the Beijing Higher People's court, that the Trademark Appraisal Committee appeal lacks the facts and the legal basis, not to support the above request, the final judgment dismissed the appeal and upheld the original verdict.