Beijing Shengzhou international successful agent Guangzhou castar Logistics Co. Ltd.

The judges to apply for trademark "castar logistics" for the reason that the application for trademark registration shall not be approved and 5280690th similar trademarks.
Guangzhou castar Logistics Co., No. 82609th refused to accept the ruling, bring a lawsuit to the Beijing first intermediate people's court, Shengzhou lawyers in litigation as castar agent of the company to court. We put forward the "trademark of the plaintiff original, to distinguish the source of goods or service role. And provide a great deal of evidence that is significant for trademark," point of view. The court's approval, and pointed out that the defendant that the application trademark violates Article < Trademark Law > tenth (2001 eight) conclusion the provisions of case error, therefore does not support. After the trial, the Beijing first intermediate people's court verdict revoked the judges make the business review word [2013] No. 82609th trademark dismissed the review decision and ordered the defendant to make a decision.